Will science ever prove...part 2

On a follow up to my scientificish post of a yesterday,  there have been some new findings in regard to "climate change".

The dude who started the Weather Channel did some research, and found that there was a direct relationship between the rising average temperature and fewer temperatures being taken. Allow me to apply my dazzling intellect to this statement.

If you try to measure the average yearly temperature at your house, but only take one sample you will have a less accurate reading. Go figure. Measure it twice, and it will be an average and change. Every time you add another sample to a set, you improve the accuracy of that set. So likewise, if you take fewer samples it will be less accurate.

The study shows that starting in 1990 monitoring stations around the world were shutdown, from 6000 to 1500 stations around the world. It's no surprise that the temperature is less accurate than before, and the global increase coincided with this shut down of stations. The real kicker to this study is the location of the stations that were shutdown. They were all in statistically lower temperature reading areas!

Did  they think it wouldn't affect the readings, or did they (NOAA, no relation to the ark builder) do it on purpose knowing that it would increase the average temperature around the globe? it's all very shady and questionable. If you ever start to question whether or not global warming is a fact, take a look at Washington D.C. over the last few days. Find out the last time there was this much snow, as well as such low temperatures.

I think that reporters have been on the streets of D.C. for the last two days looking for Mr. Gore, but as usual when it's snowing he can't be found (that's why he's never been to Canada). How many times are politicians going to try and sell us the garbage of global worming.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/02/09/john-lott-joseph-daleo-climate-change-noaa-james-hansen/